Re: Stable Release Updates types proposal (was Re: Fedora Board Meeting Recap 2010-03-11)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 01:14 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> [...]
>
> There is clearly no reason to continue this conversation with you Kevin.
> We are just going to disagree.

That's what's really sad to me. Despite that the only "hard" evidence we 
have seems to agree with what several of us have been saying - that 
Fedora is distinctive for being very up to date, even in releases - it 
seems FAB and others are going to choose to ignore that and change 
unilaterally³ change Fedora into something we don't want.

(³from our persepctive, anyway)

For all the yelling that we don't want to listen to users, it sure seems 
like you're the ones not listening. (I guess that's a tautology of 
sorts. Still it's greatly disappointing that any sort of compromise 
position has been shot down. By both sides, to be fair.)

-- 
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
-- 
Time to get out the marshmallows...

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux