Chris Adams wrote:
> Right after you _prove_ that this IS the case. How quick would you be
> to reject that poll as unscientific and meaningless if it didn't go your
> way? I thought it was a bad idea and didn't even take a look. How
> widespread was the poll among regular users (not developers)?
There is no need to prove it: The mere RISK of losing 70-80% of our users
(which is exactly what is going to happen if the poll happens to be
representative, but those changes get implemented anyway) is a risk not to
be taken lightly.
> You say "we" do something, when you really mean "the KDE SIG".
Please leave the KDE SIG out of it. When I speak for KDE SIG, I say so!
(That said, several people in KDE SIG happen to share my position at least
to some extent. But please let them speak for themselves! KDE SIG is not a
groupthink club.)
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
