Re: Stable Release Updates types proposal (was Re: Fedora Board Meeting Recap 2010-03-11)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 08:48:23AM +0100, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Dne 12.3.2010 02:26, Mike Chambers napsal(a):
> > On F13, upgrade gnome-panel to version in updates-testing and you'll get
> 
> When was F13 released? Oh, it wasn't, so it is just glorified Rawhide 
> still? And you complain about it being broken (especially in its 
> updates-*testing*)?
> 
> BTW, this is the reason why I disagree with the way how we did unfrozen 
> Rawhide. Instead of getting even more free version of Rawhide, we've got 
> one more make update and similar non-sense.
> 
Hmmm... so are we or are we not claiming that the pre-release branch is
supposed to be a valid thing for people to be running if they want
a semi-rolling flavour of Fedora?  Note that I'm not claiming that you
personally are claiming that.  Just that I'd be willing to try running F+1
for a cycle or two if, in fact, it's expected to be the place our users who
want a semi-rolling experience are expected to go.

If it's "just a glorified Rawhide" then there's really no point in telling
people to run it... they'll just get disgusted with Fedora's stability and
leave.

-Toshio

Attachment: pgpuWJ410i4oT.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux