On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 18:30 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 20:11 -0500, James Antill wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 00:14 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > Well, Fedora Extras 6 (x86_64) contained 5129 packages, which is only 300 less > > > than F11 stable updates. > > > > > > http://archive.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/extras/6/x86_64/repoview/index.html > > > > % yum repolist --releasever=11 updates > > repo id repo name status > > updates Fedora 11 - x86_64 - Updates 9,390 ... > This probably won't go well unless you two are talking about the right > terms. I believe that Michael was talking srpm numbers, where you > appear to be talking binary numbers. The Michael gave was for binary packages in FC 6 x86_64 extras: % GET http://archive.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/extras/6/x86_64/ | \ fgrep '.rpm' | \ wc -l 5129 ...maybe he thought that was srpms though. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
