Re: Fedora 13 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting: 2010-03-04 @ 01:00 UTC Recap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 15:53 -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> We should change or refine the Freeze Policy page then.  Having different
>> definitions of what is required for alpha to go out and what can go in
>> after alpha leads to incorrect expectations on the part of developers.
> 
> I agree. I think probably all we need to do is remove the weasel-word
> 'testable' and give a more solid definition there.

Well, the Freeze Policy page is about targets feature owners should meet, 
not about Alpha blockers.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux