Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 02:41:46 -0500, James wrote:

> > > % yum repolist --releasever=11 updates
> > > repo id               repo name                                   status
> > > updates               Fedora 11 - x86_64 - Updates                9,390
> ...
> > This probably won't go well unless you two are talking about the right
> > terms.  I believe that Michael was talking srpm numbers, where you
> > appear to be talking binary numbers.
> 
>  The Michael gave was for binary packages in FC 6 x86_64 extras:
> 
> % GET http://archive.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/extras/6/x86_64/ | \
>   fgrep '.rpm' | \
>   wc -l
> 5129
> 
> ...maybe he thought that was srpms though.

No, I compared that number to those displayed in bodhi, assuming they
would be the updates count instead of the tickets count. What is being
displayed in bodhi is inconsistent and misleading, as it says "3 pending"
for EPEL 4 in one place, but "7 pending" in another place. I just didn't
want to compare with F12 updates, which has a much lower package count
than FE6. Or F13, which is one arch less than FE6.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux