On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 11:06 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Peter Jones wrote: > > This is the plan that already isn't working. > > Is it really "not working"? Or are we overblowing a minor incident which > didn't even cause all that much trouble and trying to swallow a cure which > is worse than the disease? I think it's really the latter. The one "minor incident" being where the project leader had to post to the world that we'd screwed it up, and got covered in LWN etc. I don't think I'd like to wait for something you'd class as a non-minor incident. I probably spend at least an hour a week updating, and current have over 220 packages available to update (a significant part of which are shared libraries linked against most of the distro.). Download size for everything is just over 330MB. History summary since GA shows over 1,100 Erases, Installs, Obsoletes and Updates. Probably when I next reboot, I'll just do a giant "yum update -y" and hope for the best ... which is what I assume most of our users do. If you think there's nothing wrong with that, and even more so if you think updates-testing should be bypassed in a significant number of cases, well then rawhide is that => way. -- James Antill - james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/releases http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/whatsnew/3.2.27 http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/YumMultipleMachineCaching -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
