On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> You're distorting the Fedora model to accommodate KDE roadmaps. > > No, this goes far beyond KDE. KDE roadmaps are just one strong argument for > doing things this way. Many more packages benefit or would benefit from > version upgrades during a release. In my undestanding, KDE makes new feature releases (b releases) and bug fix releases (c releases), where versions are kde-a.b.c. How is that 'one strong argument for doing things this way' in fedora where new features are added into new Fn releases? I talked to rdieter about this and said that part of the problem is that not all of the bug fixes end to bugfix releases and would be thus ommitted from stable fedora releases. Being a pure KDE upstream problem, it should be solved there and would certainly get more focus if fedora would start enforcing it. If KDE doesn't put required focus to that problem, then it's the SIG/pkg maintener's problem to communicate that with upstream. For note, I'm among those who don't want feature upgrades into stable fedora release. If you're so happy to chase latest and gratest, feel free to do it in your sf.net private repo. Your current proposal: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Stability_Proposal still fails in that part. Tuju -- Ajatteleva ihminen tarvitsee unta. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
