Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 02:11 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> You and everyone else, please stop proposing Rawhide as the solution for me
>> and people who want the same "update everything that doesn't break things"
>> policy, it does NOT fit our usecase at all!
>
> If you don't like rawhide for that use case, find another operating
> system.  I'm tired of our stable releases getting tonnes of updates.
> I'm tired of what F11 shipped like being completely different today.
> I'm tired of waiting for many many hours while we try to compose out the
> 3444 individual updates in F11 stable.  (that's right, 3444 srpms worth
> of updates.  F11 only had 7446 srpms to begin with!!).  This is not the
> style of distribution I wish to produce or consume.  If this is the
> style of distribution you wish to produce or consume, then I encourage
> you to go find another distribution or start your own.

Okay, I have to ask: why are you right and Kevin is wrong? What makes 
your vision of Fedora more worthy than his? (Especially when his is the 
apparent incumbent?)

Some of us like Fedora just fine the way it is, and don't want to see it 
change to match your vision.

-- 
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
-- 
Ncurses. Blessing console programs since 1993.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux