On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Thomas Moschny wrote:
2010/3/3 Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx>:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 11:52:49PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 22:37 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
We've made a mess and as a member of fesco I'd expect you to be helping in
cleaning up the mess, not making it worse b/c fesco HAS to be about the
long term growth and sustainability of fedora.
I'm starting to think this thread needs a hall monitor. Unfortunately
half of them seem to be in it, swinging away.
Why? Other than one instance, which was my own, there hasn't been anything in
this thread that I would consider hall monitor worthy.
Wording starts to get near to unacceptable imho. People not sharing
the view that there are to many updates to so-called stable releases
(a 'fire-hose' of a 'horrendous' and 'insane' amount of updates) are
denoted not being normal.
I think we've always referred to the stream of updates as 'the fire-hose'.
It's an expression from a movie called UHF. A character in the movie says
"You win the prize you get to drink from mr. firehose!" Then proceeds to
spray a firehose at a child who is excited to drink from the firehose.
in the context it is really funny.
-sv
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
