Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Thomas Moschny wrote:

2010/3/3 Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx>:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 11:52:49PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 22:37 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:

We've made a mess and as a member of fesco I'd expect you to be helping in
cleaning up the mess, not making it worse b/c fesco HAS to be about the
long term growth and sustainability of fedora.

I'm starting to think this thread needs a hall monitor. Unfortunately
half of them seem to be in it, swinging away.

Why?  Other than one instance, which was my own, there hasn't been anything in
this thread that I would consider hall monitor worthy.

Wording starts to get near to unacceptable imho. People not sharing
the view that there are to many updates to so-called stable releases
(a 'fire-hose' of a 'horrendous' and 'insane' amount of updates) are
denoted not being normal.

I think we've always referred to the stream of updates as 'the fire-hose'. It's an expression from a movie called UHF. A character in the movie says "You win the prize you get to drink from mr. firehose!" Then proceeds to spray a firehose at a child who is excited to drink from the firehose.

in the context it is really funny.

-sv
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux