Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2010/3/3 Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 11:52:49PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 22:37 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
>>
>>> We've made a mess and as a member of fesco I'd expect you to be helping in
>>> cleaning up the mess, not making it worse b/c fesco HAS to be about the
>>> long term growth and sustainability of fedora.
>>
>>I'm starting to think this thread needs a hall monitor. Unfortunately
>>half of them seem to be in it, swinging away.
>
> Why?  Other than one instance, which was my own, there hasn't been anything in
> this thread that I would consider hall monitor worthy.

Wording starts to get near to unacceptable imho. People not sharing
the view that there are to many updates to so-called stable releases
(a 'fire-hose' of a 'horrendous' and 'insane' amount of updates) are
denoted not being normal.

- Thomas
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux