Adam Williamson wrote: > Oh, I see. You're inferring a cause where there's no reason to. I didn't > realize that. What other reasons do you consider then? Pure chance? Doesn't look very likely to me. It's much more likely the reason Mandriva provides fewer new versions is because of the split update streams and the default being the conservative one. Restrictive policies such as "no system library backports" (even where backwards-compatible) (which in turn precludes some application updates, e.g. it's quite common for packages to require a new Qt) may also be part of the reason. > I wasn't admitting any point. The fact that less stuff gets backported > in MDV is more or less a direct function of a) whether anyone actually > wants it to be backported and b) the number of maintainers. So you want me to file bugs asking "Please dear maintainer, pretty please, would you please be so kind as to please provide a backport for this package, I really need the new version, please! I supplicate you!" for every single package I'd like updated? Huh? It's the maintainer's job to realize the package needs updating, nobody should have to request it. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel