Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adam Williamson wrote:
> Oh, I see. You're inferring a cause where there's no reason to. I didn't
> realize that.

What other reasons do you consider then? Pure chance? Doesn't look very 
likely to me. It's much more likely the reason Mandriva provides fewer new 
versions is because of the split update streams and the default being the 
conservative one. Restrictive policies such as "no system library backports" 
(even where backwards-compatible) (which in turn precludes some application 
updates, e.g. it's quite common for packages to require a new Qt) may also 
be part of the reason.

> I wasn't admitting any point. The fact that less stuff gets backported
> in MDV is more or less a direct function of a) whether anyone actually
> wants it to be backported and b) the number of maintainers.

So you want me to file bugs asking "Please dear maintainer, pretty please, 
would you please be so kind as to please provide a backport for this 
package, I really need the new version, please! I supplicate you!" for every 
single package I'd like updated? Huh? It's the maintainer's job to realize 
the package needs updating, nobody should have to request it.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux