Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> OK, but then we're not talking about the person who's happy to stay
> with the software they have, but about a more typical person who is
> not too risk-averse and is willing to consider unsolicited updates.
> Those are different dudes.

The person who's not willing to do any updates is a very dangerous person 
(think security updates, and also consider the fact that we don't really 
support selective updates, so pulling only security updates isn't that good 
a plan either; I know we technically have yum-security, but if somebody 
files a bug about my security update not working with some ancient version 
of some other package, I'll just file it away as NOTABUG with the comment 
"yum update", and I know I'm not alone in that).

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux