On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Doug Ledford wrote: >> Fixes my problem >> Works for me (someone testing that didn't necessarily have any of the >> problem supposedly fixed by this update just noting that their system >> still works ok with the update) >> Doesn't fix my problem (but doesn't necessarily imply it's any worse >> than before) >> Causes new problems > > Yes, this makes more sense than just +1 and -1. > >> (which should, IMO, be an automatic veto of any push to stable, requiring >> intervention to override) > > But no, please no! While it should definitely prevent an automatic push if > the maintainer enabled that, it should not keep the maintainer from pushing > anyway. Well the way I read it, "manually pushing anyway" is the "requiring intervention" part. - Panu - -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
