On 02/27/2010 11:27 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 10:57 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > Yeah, it's not perfect: there are cases where we have, say, a complex > kernel update which works fine for most people but causes a significant > regression for some particular bit of hardware. We wouldn't want to put > that update out, but it's easy for it to get five +1s before someone > with the specific bit of hardware comes by and gives it a -1...and even > then, +4 looks good if you're not reading the feedback too carefully. > And of course the opposite - where some strong views on a minor non-stopper might hold things back even tho more careful thought may lead one to release and do minor fixups later. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
