On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 06:03 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > 2) Recent dnssec-conf updates all did receive several -1, nevertheless > these updates were pushed. This is indeed a problem. Obviously, relying on the judgment of maintainers isn't working. ...which is why there's a proposal not to rely entirely on the judgment of maintainers any more. Which is why there's a proposal not to do so any more. Look how everything fits together! > 3) dnssec-conf-1.21-8.fc12.noarch does not work for me, it's as broken > as its predecessors for me. > > => This system doesn't work. See above. > > So the system does, in fact, work, in so far as it gives us > > a usable indication of very bad breakages. > IMO, only on occasions the damage already has happened (dnssec-conf). I disagree. I already cited one example in this thread of a broken update being caught before it went to stable. I can cite several others, if you require. > The vast majority of packages gets pushed without any votes. Again, no votes does not mean no information. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
