On 03/02/2010 05:48 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 05:13 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > >>>> Well, the only positive impact bodhi had on me was bodhi implementing a >>>> more or less usable web-frontend, where Fedora had nothing in place >>>> before. This doesn't mean it is a good system and even less does this >>>> mean this system is perfect or bug-free. >>>> >>> Didn't I just get done saying it's not perfect or bug-free, but that >>> doesn't mean the sensible answer is to burn it down? >>> >> I didn't say "burn it down"!! >> >> Bluntly put, I am saying "karma is dysfunctional/conceptionally >> inapplicable", the "web GUI leaves much to be desired", "there is no >> usable CLI" and "koji/bodji" integration sucks" ... but this is >> off-topic, here. >> > You said 'Abandon it (I don't think this would change anything wrt. to > QA in Fedora)', which sounds like 'burn it down' to me. Oh, could it be there is a misunderstanding? The "it", I was referring to was "karma-voting". I don't see any sense in keeping "karma-voting" and consider "abandoning karma-voting" to be no loss to Fedora. I never intended to say "abandon bodhi". Ralf -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
