Le lundi 01 mars 2010 à 15:16 -0800, Jesse Keating a écrit : > On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 17:34 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote: > > > > One could argue that the current bodhi karma system is simply too > > simplistic for real use cases. Maybe instead of just +1 -1, there > > should be: > > > > Fixes my problem > > Works for me (someone testing that didn't necessarily have any of the > > problem supposedly fixed by this update just noting that their system > > still works ok with the update) > > Doesn't fix my problem (but doesn't necessarily imply it's any worse > > than before) > > Causes new problems (which should, IMO, be an automatic veto of any push > > to stable, requiring intervention to override) > > I agree that this is good data to have, and that karma right now is > pretty simplistic (which was it's goal). Simplistic karma is far better > than what we had before, which was nothing. With enough data points one can print pretty graphes that show vote repartition¹. Those are harder to skew than averages. However, they require many data points and bohdi is far from that today ¹ For example, the bargraphs on http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/anime.php?id=840 http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/anime.php?id=2276 (amazon uses a simpler system) -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
