Re: Bodhi karma feature request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Doug Ledford wrote:
> One could argue that the current bodhi karma system is simply too
> simplistic for real use cases.  Maybe instead of just +1 -1, there
> should be:
>
> Fixes my problem
> Works for me (someone testing that didn't necessarily have any of the
> problem supposedly fixed by this update just noting that their system
> still works ok with the update)
> Doesn't fix my problem (but doesn't necessarily imply it's any worse
> than before)
> Causes new problems (which should, IMO, be an automatic veto of any push
> to stable, requiring intervention to override)

I was thinking that negative karma really ought to count as -5 instead 
of -1, but I like this suggestion a lot better. I'd vote for it (if I 
could legally vote :-( ).

-- 
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
-- 
Person A: It's an ISO standard.
Person B: ...And that means what?
   -- mal (http://theangryadmin.blogspot.com/2008/04/future.html)

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux