On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 11:47 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Jon Masters wrote: > > One thing I would suggest being considered in an alternative proposal is > > a compromise policy for specific stacks or non-critical path packages. > > For example, if the standard policy affecting me as a GNOME user is that > > major changes will be confined to new releases (my very strong personal > > preference) then I don't personally much care if it is official policy > > that KDE is allowed an exception to rebase on some other schedule. > > Well, IMHO GNOME should get the same treatment KDE is already getting, but I > don't care all that much about GNOME, so I could probably agree to such a > compromise. > > Still, don't you want to run an actually maintained GNOME where bugs are > still being fixed rather than being stuck with them forever? Does GNOME > continue releasing bugfixes for the old branch after the new release? (KDE > definitely doesn't.) > GNOME has bug-fix releases (e.g. 2.28.1, 2.28.2, etc) and we do package those as updates for Fedora releases. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
