Jon Masters wrote:
> One thing I would suggest being considered in an alternative proposal is
> a compromise policy for specific stacks or non-critical path packages.
> For example, if the standard policy affecting me as a GNOME user is that
> major changes will be confined to new releases (my very strong personal
> preference) then I don't personally much care if it is official policy
> that KDE is allowed an exception to rebase on some other schedule.
Well, IMHO GNOME should get the same treatment KDE is already getting, but I
don't care all that much about GNOME, so I could probably agree to such a
compromise.
Still, don't you want to run an actually maintained GNOME where bugs are
still being fixed rather than being stuck with them forever? Does GNOME
continue releasing bugfixes for the old branch after the new release? (KDE
definitely doesn't.)
But this has absolutely nothing to do with direct stable pushes anymore!
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
