Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Till Maas wrote:
> My proposal: If it passes all AutoQA tests and matches the criteria by
> Kevin Koffler[0], then the update is ok, except that critical path
> packages should be inspected more carefully.
>
> [0]
> [http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-February/131570.html

I think I've written more complete writeups in earlier mailing list posts, 
it may make sense to dig them up.

(And by the way, there's only one 'f' in "Kofler". ;-) )

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux