Till Maas wrote: > No, because there are updates that, e.g. require manual intervention, or > are more likely to break a lot of stuff. These would make the difference > between the releases. Right. (And thanks for your replies further up this subthread, you left me nothing more to add. ;-) ) > E.g. an update from KDE3 to KDE4 should only happen from a Fedora release > to another, but an update from KDE 4.x.y to 4.x.y+1 would be ok. Indeed. > Maybe even from 4.x.y to 4.x+1.z, but I am not that familiar with KDE > upgrades. They're basically safe, and in fact we do this kind of updates now (see e.g. 4.4.0 which got pushed to F11 and F12). > Or postgres updates are a kind of updates that afaik require manual > intervention, therefore they should also only happen from release to > release. Right. > There was a good list about criteria for good updates somewhere in the > thread, I can try to find it again if you want. I posted those. :-) You already found them, but I think versions in earlier threads may be more complete, I may have forgotten something this time as I didn't have much time to think of all the details nor to search for the earlier posts. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel