Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/27/2010 03:13 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:52 AM, James Antill wrote:
>> On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 01:36 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> My point is that there are plenty of users who want the current updates or
>>> even more updates.
>>
>>  "Citation needed"
>>
> 
> Just a few out of so many:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529433
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562645
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1066
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457480
> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/pipermail/planetccrma/2010-January/016353.html
> 
> Orcan


 I do want updates. Kernel updates, for example, are very important -
they carry many improvements - not just drivers but functionality as
well. The ones that are less obvious are the bugs that happen rarely but
that can be nasty (an occasional file system glitch for example).

 The rare-but-nasty bug fixes will seldom have user demand - but
nonetheless once identified and fixed should be shared.

 These kind of non-user-demand driven fixes should not be ignored in any
noone-is-asking so dont release approach.


 [speaking of which where on earth is 2.6.32.9 ????]


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux