Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 10:34 -0600, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> On 2/26/2010 7:26, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> > Another annoying issue is updates with no explanations. There is a
> > "Notes" field in bodhi that many people just ignore for an unknown
> > reason. Any update with less than a specified number of characters
> > (~40) in the Notes should also be banned.
> 
> What if bodhi were to pre-populate that field with the update's 
> changelog entry so there's at least something there by default?

That would be counter-productive. At least right now there's a big empty
field assaulting your visual cortex when you go through the update
process. If it pre-filled the changelog, it's even easier to just skip
that field.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux