On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Marcela Maslanova wrote: > > ----- "Matthias Clasen" wrote: > >> >> I think banning stable pushes is the right idea. None of your reasons >> is >> very convincing. >> +1 Another annoying issue is updates with no explanations. There is a "Notes" field in bodhi that many people just ignore for an unknown reason. Any update with less than a specified number of characters (~40) in the Notes should also be banned. I can't see a reason to make exceptions. If people used the testing repo appropriately, things would actually get tested. I wish there was a solution without some sort of banning, but apparently, there is not. > My packages are rarely tested and I forget them in testing phase for a > long time. Also fixing BR don't need testing. This is not quite right. Adding a BR might mean enabling a previously disabled feature of the software, which DOES need testing. Any change needs testing. Even one liners. Orcan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
