Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 01:16:43PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:

> I would like to collect feedback on this issue. If you want to disable 
> direct stable pushes, why? Could there be a less radical solution to that 
> problem (e.g. a policy discouraging direct stable pushes for some specific 
> types of changes rather than a blanket ban)? On the other hand, if (like me) 
> you DON'T want that feature to go away, please provide valid use cases.

Imho it takes too long to get packages into updates-testing, if people
are really interested in testing packages, they often seem to get
packages directly from Koji, e.g. on this update I got 3 positive Karma
points (one of them was anonymous) within 76 minutes after submitting
the update:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-0604

It did not seem very useful to delay this update that also fixed several
very annoying bugs any further.

Regards
Till

Attachment: pgpxieWgbGZ3U.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux