On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 02:07:05PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: >On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 01:16:43PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Hi, >> >> at the FESCo meeting on Tuesday, everyone except me seemed to be set on >> wanting to disable the possibility to queue updates directly to stable in >> Bodhi. > >I may be remebering wrong, but an argument for bodhi against those who >wanted a simpler push mechanism (like wwhat was in the fedora extra days) >and argued that bodhi will add more unecessary delays was that there >always was the possibility to push to stable for packagers. > >Bringinig down productivity of good packagers for a few bad ones, is, >in my opinion, not a good move. > >Also, I find it quite ridiculous to have to give use cases, if people >in FESCo have never needed a direct push to stable, they necessarily >haven't done enough packaging -- though seeing who is in FESCo, it looks >quite strange to me since some members are seasoned packagers and some >even were here before bodhi. This is why it would have been prudent to wait for an actual policy proposal. Nobody said disallow direct-to-stable pushes completely, entirely, with no exceptions. That would indeed be absurd. josh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
