----- "Matthias Clasen" <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 13:16 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > I think banning stable pushes is the right idea. None of your reasons > is > very convincing. > My packages are rarely tested and I forget them in testing phase for a long time. Also fixing BR don't need testing. I simply need push immediately the new/fixed package. The process of updates is right now inconvenient and it could lead to more bugs fixed as 'closed in rawhide'. > > * A regression which causes big breakage at least for some people > slipped > > through testing for whatever reason. We urgently want the fix to get > out > > ASAP. > > But presumably we still want to test the fix, to avoid introducing > yet > another regression ?! > > > * A regression slipped through testing for whatever reason and the > patch is > > trivial. We want the fix to get out ASAP, and the risk of breakage > is very > > low. > > Just go up to your first argument: the breage slips through. That is > exactly what happens if your judgement of 'low risk' turns out to be > wrong. And it will... > > > * A trivial bugfix (like a one-line diff), tested and confirmed to > fix the > > bug by at least one person. The risk of breakage is extremely low. > > Again: go up. Breakage always happens to somebody else. That one > person > tested the fix is not enough. > > > > Matthias > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
