On Tue, 2004-06-15 at 16:04 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > The kernel-source package became noarch. This had a LOT of advantages, > including cleanups, saves a TON of diskspace, it IS noarch, it saves a ton of > build time too. It allows easier adding of other architectures as well. > > Why not wait for FC3? Well I want the kernel development tree to be the same > tree updates come from, and remain stable at all times. That avoids double > work an missed bugfixes Having kernel-source become noarch is a non-issue from the impact on ISVs. The renaming is the problem. Dax Kelson Guru Labs
