Re: kernel-source vs. kernel-sourcecode (please revert)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 11:05:11AM -0600, Dax Kelson wrote:
> > tree updates come from, and remain stable at all times. That avoids double
> > work an missed bugfixes
> 
> Having kernel-source become noarch is a non-issue from the impact on
> ISVs. The renaming is the problem.

I rather not have renamed it either, however the impact should have been
low; only people who want to build their entire new kernel use
kernel-source (or should). Yum now can at least get to the new package,
which was the sole reason for the rename (well together with up2date)

Attachment: pgp78tPHYxhdY.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux