On Tue, 2004-06-15 at 09:45 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > If I'm understanding Arjan correctly, all references to kernel-source in > regard 2.6 kernel module building is a bug and all instructions should > be fixed so that people aren't told to use kernel-source OR > kernel-sourcecode for module building. It isn't just "module" building, it is (primarily in my case) "kernel" building. My personal interest in this is as a courseware author and the "kernel building chapter". Linux in general has too many needless exceptions. It makes documentation much more difficult/dense for the writer and the reader. As an aside, SUSE 9.1 drops the "k_" kernel RPM naming convention and has adopted the RH naming convention. Hooray for removing trivial incompatibilities!! Oh wait, here comes kernel-sourcecode. :( > > There are several references to kernel-source that will end up obsoleted > > and will confuse users. Messages in mailing lists, installation > > documentation, etc. > > there is installation documentation for fedora? Absolutely. Take a visit to your local Barnes and Noble, IT training class, or as Axel Thimm pointed out, do a google search. Dax Kelson Guru Labs
