On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 01:29:34PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > these are ALL wrong then with the 2.6 kernel and with the 2.6 rpms. Really. > > Removing custom and all those hacks are *WRONG*. Even on 2.4. > > Any kernel module that does that is *BROKEN* build wise. Extremely broken. > > Practice says otherwise. kernel module rpms for 2.4 and 2.6 are out > there and are in use by several thousands of users without any > problems regarding kernel infrastructure. they are still broken and violating the rules. > > In FC2 that uses ZERO files from kernel-source (unlike FC1 where that was a > > symlink into kernel-source). > > Any other method WILL eventually result in non-working modules. > > They do work. for some value of work. I can guarantee you that this will break within the next half year or so. > google). Could you please revert that, and have it fixed in yum > instead? no I can't really.
Attachment:
pgp2kU3pJNtP7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
