On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 01:34:56PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 01:29:34PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > these are ALL wrong then with the 2.6 kernel and with the 2.6 rpms. Really. > > > Removing custom and all those hacks are *WRONG*. Even on 2.4. > > > Any kernel module that does that is *BROKEN* build wise. Extremely broken. > > > > Practice says otherwise. kernel module rpms for 2.4 and 2.6 are out > > there and are in use by several thousands of users without any > > problems regarding kernel infrastructure. > > they are still broken and violating the rules. Yes, but the users wouldn't see it like that. And regarding kernels 2.4.x, I thought /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build was just a symbolic link to /usr/src/linux-`uname -r`? Regards, Luciano Rocha -- Consciousness: that annoying time between naps.
