On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > > The kernel-source package became noarch. This had a LOT of advantages, > > including cleanups, saves a TON of diskspace, it IS noarch, it saves a ton of > > build time too. It allows easier adding of other architectures as well. > > Sorry but I don't follow. Why disk space or build time? Doesn't the > package have the same contents whether it is labeled i386 or noarch? Now that Fedora Core supports more the x86, kernel source doesn't need to be rebuilt for *every* arch, and every arch (that shares the same kernel anyway) can also share the same noarch.rpm. -- Rex
