On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:24:45AM +0100, Sven Lankes wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:40:15PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > >> Yes, I know, because I co-maintain a package using qt and I recently > >> read something from the maintainer that he can not push a bugfix update > >> to stable, because a qt override is in the buildroot. > > > The solution there is to talk to us, we can get the Qt 4.6 stuff off the > > buildroot for a while so he can build his bugfix update. That's what > > #fedora-kde is for. (IRC is the best communication method for this stuff > > because it's real time, please use it!) > > I'm assuming that Till is talking about my comment > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549717#c2 on merkaartor > (which he co-maintains). > > So nothing to see here - please move on. This is about not being able to > do a scratch build of an svn-snapshot of merkaartor. Nothing that I > would ever push to a stable release. Yes, this was the comment I meant. Since it seems to be easily possible to push an updated merkaartor package, I am more in favor to push it. The bug is already two months old and renders the Fedora package for the reporter useless. Also merkaartor upstream provides windows binary releases based on snapshots: http://www.merkaartor.org/ Regards Till
Attachment:
pgpRjN1y7tWvr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
