On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:40:15PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Till Maas wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 03:28:37PM +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > > >> Take KDE for example: Although the KDE SIG is doing a great job in > >> avoiding breakdowns, I doubt that each and every maintainer of a QT or > >> KDE app is always aware of the changes before they happen. If things > >> still seem to be working in F-13 or rawhide, he might not even be aware > >> of the custom tag. > > > > Yes, I know, because I co-maintain a package using qt and I recently > > read something from the maintainer that he can not push a bugfix update > > to stable, because a qt override is in the buildroot. > > The solution there is to talk to us, we can get the Qt 4.6 stuff off the > buildroot for a while so he can build his bugfix update. That's what > #fedora-kde is for. (IRC is the best communication method for this stuff > because it's real time, please use it!) I'll remember this. But why don't you use a special tag for this instead of a buildroot override? I believe this question is not answered and I even might have asked it once in IRC. ;-) Regards Till
Attachment:
pgpleQJf9V1S4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
