Re: Fedora 13 has been branched!!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:44:10AM +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:

> And what about the updates that don't have a custom tag?

If the update is big enough, that a lot of packages require a rebuild,
using a custom tag seems to be the best approach, so if there is none,
ask of it. If there is no need for one, then the buildroot overwrite
approach seems to be good enough. Or what is the specific problem you
are seeing?

The advantage of using a custom tag is also, that it does not touch the
buildroots of all packages and therefore makes it possible to still push
updates for the affected dependent packages, if they are required to fix
a bug. Afaik currently kde does not use a custom tag, and therefore if
one wants to update a kde/qt dependent package, it would be build with
a incompatible kde/qt version and therefore cannot be pushed to stable.

Regards
Till

Attachment: pgpBFl6jYNn9u.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux