On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 01:32 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: > This only works for things developed in Fedora or for projects like > Gnome, because we are closely following their schedule. Other projects > have other schedules and we need to be flexible. I really like no frozen > rawhide, but IMO we have lost some flexibility for the n+1 release. > There is more flexibility for n+2 but I doubt that anybody will/can make > use of it. We not even have a feature process for F14, so why would > anyone start a feature now? Because often the work of a feature needs more time than the short 3 months we've seen before between N release and N+1 feature freeze. And often times the features are done or near done by the time FESCo votes on them, starting early is a good thing. > > > > I think we still need to be able to treat F-13 different than in the > > > released branches, at least before beta freeze. > > > > The beta milestone is when we're supposed to have all the bugs fixed, > > not when we stop throwing in development builds. > > Right, but upgrading from Xfce 4.8 pre1 to pre2 *is* bugfixing. Yes, that may be true. It is unfortunate that you'll now have to do a buildroot override task, but that was a negative impact we were willing to take. As I said in other mails, if you're seeing a long lag in tag requests, we can try to grow the list of folks with tag rights to cover other time zones. Use of koji wait-repo can help here, and nearly replicate chain-build. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel