On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 14:57 +0200, Sergey Rudchenko wrote:
> On 1/29/2010 2:38 PM, Hans Ulrich Niedermann wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:32:15 +0100
> > Ralf Corsepius<rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Presuming /sbin/lspci is supposed to work without having /usr/
> >> mounted, then libpci.so.X needs to reside in /lib|/lib64.
> >>
> >> Or differently: Everything in /bin and /sbin, must only be
> >> dynamically linked against libraries in /lib|/lib64. The fact lspci
> >> is linked against /usr/{lib|lib64}/libpci.so.X is a defect.
> >>
> > I agree.
> >
> > For the record, the same issue applies to /sbin/lsusb
> > and /usr/lib/libusb-0.1.so.4.
> >
> > I have not checked whether there are other cases.
> >
> >
> What if we link the lspci and lsusb as static binaries? That would allow
> us not to break the filesystem architecture and have usable tools.
There's no need for that. Binaries in /bin or /sbin should have their
libraries in /lib rather than /usr/lib . This is perfectly OK under FHS.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
