Adam Williamson wrote: > There was a clear failure in this process, though, which was that the > update was sent straight to updates and did not go through > updates-testing. I can't see any reason why that should be acceptable > for an update to a very popular package which manipulates data that is > obviously important to people (their email). Can a Thunderbird > maintainer please explain why this update did not go through the > updates-testing process? It was a security update. -- Rex -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
