On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 20:44 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > > Imho the only real problem from your list is, if a package is > unmaintained, because if it is maintained, the maintainer usually uses > it, otherwise he would just drop it. If upstream is dead but the > maintainer fixes bugs, when they are found, I do not see a problem, > either. Often maintainers don't realize they have some of these packages, or the maintainers have left the project. Even your most stable packages get touched nearly once a year due to distribution changes. With a more active rpm upstream I suspect we'll be seeing even more need to rebuild everything, at least once a year. In fact, if we were only checking once a year, I bet many of these packages are going to get hidden behind the mass rebuilder. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
