Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:13:33AM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 13:33 -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote: >> >> >> >> My thinking is that we don't use origin/next or origin/maint either >> >> and both are common upstream in git and the kernel. >> >> >> >> While origin/master is common, >> > >> > origin/master isn't "common", it's the friggin default. Every single >> > git repo I interact with has development happening on origin/master. >> > It's way more than just "common". >> >> You can set any branch as default via origin/HEAD, and some do. It is >> also easy to make origin/devel an alias for origin/master. > > So what's an alias? See git-symbolic-ref(1). HEAD is an example. > If that's so, that's a much better solution than a symlink. They used to be implemented with a symlink. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@xxxxxxxxxx GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now for something completely different." -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
