On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:22:35AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 13:16 -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote: > > > > I'd like to suggest (again ;) that origin/devel be used. Either that, > > or use master as the local dir, e.g. kernel/master. Having it differ > > seems like a recipe for unneeded confusion. > > > > > > I'm willing to listen to other opinions on this. Personally I'd really > rather not change the meaning of origin/master. "devel" would show up > as a directory in the "classic" view only to match what CVS did. I'd > even be willing to make two directories, one a symlink to the other. > You'd get kernel/master and you'd also get kernel/devel as a symlink to > kernel/master > master makes a lot of sense from a git perspective. devel (or rawhide) makes sense from what we actually call the code that that branch eventually makes. A symlink might alleviate the confusion but it could also add to it. (For instance, I was operating in the kernel/devel branch but when I want to git checkout -b devel git gives me a strange error.) I don't see a clear answer for what's best here, yet. :-( -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpkXAwhAaIDS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
