On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 13:33 -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote: > > My thinking is that we don't use origin/next or origin/maint either > and both are common upstream in git and the kernel. > > While origin/master is common, origin/master isn't "common", it's the friggin default. Every single git repo I interact with has development happening on origin/master. It's way more than just "common". > for our use, 'git push origin devel' (or > rawhide) makes more sense as it matches the use for other branches, > git push origin F-12. There's nothing magical or required about using > master as the main branch. If our maintainer has to type that out, i think we've failed the conversion. The thought here is that you'd be doing "git push" and stuff will just happen right. But /if/ you wanted to do things manually then it should match just about every other git repo out there, where the main branch is origin/master > > Whether other users will be more confused by the incongruity of master > versus devel or that it differs from what they think git may require, > I don't know. Yep, it's an opinion thing :/ -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
