On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:13:33AM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 13:33 -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote: > >> > >> My thinking is that we don't use origin/next or origin/maint either > >> and both are common upstream in git and the kernel. > >> > >> While origin/master is common, > > > > origin/master isn't "common", it's the friggin default. Every single > > git repo I interact with has development happening on origin/master. > > It's way more than just "common". > > You can set any branch as default via origin/HEAD, and some do. It is > also easy to make origin/devel an alias for origin/master. So what's an alias? It sounds like a git feature that makes an alternate name for a branch and inside of git the two are 100% equivalent. If that's so, that's a much better solution than a symlink. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpcCIosAIpt6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
