On 11/02/2009 03:47 PM, Denis Leroy wrote: > On 11/02/2009 07:18 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: >> That may be true, but since cdrecord is not shippable, it's a pretty >> vacuous truth. > > Out of curiosity, was that just because of the GPL2-CDDL mix ? Or was > there another reason ? Last I checked, only mkisofs is affected by that > and the rest of cdrecord is pure CDDL. If we patched mkisofs away, would > it be shippable ? That would be a significantly notable fork. If someone did remove all the dependent GPLv2 code in the cdrecord source, I would probably be willing to audit the package for possible inclusion, but I could not in good conscience recommend that anyone maintain that forked code in Fedora, as the upstream author has a long and storied history of being... problematic. ~spot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
