W dniu 03.11.2009 00:19, Tom "spot" Callaway pisze: > On 11/02/2009 03:47 PM, Denis Leroy wrote: >> On 11/02/2009 07:18 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: >>> That may be true, but since cdrecord is not shippable, it's a pretty >>> vacuous truth. >> >> Out of curiosity, was that just because of the GPL2-CDDL mix ? Or was >> there another reason ? Last I checked, only mkisofs is affected by that >> and the rest of cdrecord is pure CDDL. If we patched mkisofs away, would >> it be shippable ? > > That would be a significantly notable fork. If someone did remove all > the dependent GPLv2 code in the cdrecord source, I would probably be > willing to audit the package for possible inclusion, but I could not in > good conscience recommend that anyone maintain that forked code in > Fedora, as the upstream author has a long and storied history of > being... problematic. > > ~spot > opensuse are shipping cdrecord, maybe it would be worth checking what they changed, if at all? Julian -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
