On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 18:16 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote: > Dne 2.11.2009 17:31, Kevin Kofler napsal: > > Ankur Sinha wrote: > >> "wodim is completely unmaintained since May 6th 2007, don't > >> expect to see any fixes anytime soon as long as Redhat > >> continues to distribute wodim instead of the original software." > >> > >> Can someone please clear this up? > > > > It's just the usual FUD from Jörg Schilling. Ignore it. > > > > The latest commit to cdrkit upstream was 3 weeks ago. > > Although you are technically right, the commits for the last two years > have been boring cleanups, typo fixes and warning silencers. They don't > seem to be fixing any actual bugs in CD/DVD burning. > > The last commit that did something which looks like a technical change > was indeed on 2007-05-06 ( > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debburn/cdrkit/trunk/wodim/?rev=767&sc=1 ). > > Look here for the log and read the commit messages: > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debburn/cdrkit/trunk/wodim/?op=log&rev=0&sc=0&isdir=1 > > So wodim does not look like a well maintained project to me. That may be true, but since cdrecord is not shippable, it's a pretty vacuous truth. The solution is obviously to fix the bug and help revive upstream, or else host a development tree on fh if upstream stays idle. - ajax
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
