On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 18:16 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote: >> Dne 2.11.2009 17:31, Kevin Kofler napsal: >> > Ankur Sinha wrote: >> >> "wodim is completely unmaintained since May 6th 2007, don't >> >> expect to see any fixes anytime soon as long as Redhat >> >> continues to distribute wodim instead of the original software." >> >> >> >> Can someone please clear this up? >> > >> > It's just the usual FUD from Jörg Schilling. Ignore it. >> > >> > The latest commit to cdrkit upstream was 3 weeks ago. >> >> Although you are technically right, the commits for the last two years >> have been boring cleanups, typo fixes and warning silencers. They don't >> seem to be fixing any actual bugs in CD/DVD burning. >> >> The last commit that did something which looks like a technical change >> was indeed on 2007-05-06 ( >> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debburn/cdrkit/trunk/wodim/?rev=767&sc=1 ). >> >> Look here for the log and read the commit messages: >> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debburn/cdrkit/trunk/wodim/?op=log&rev=0&sc=0&isdir=1 >> >> So wodim does not look like a well maintained project to me. > > That may be true, but since cdrecord is not shippable, it's a pretty > vacuous truth. The solution is obviously to fix the bug and help revive > upstream, or else host a development tree on fh if upstream stays idle. Or switch to libburn and friends. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
